Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.

1. The ideas and opinions expressed in the submitted manuscript are the sole responsibility of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the journal

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after the publication acceptance, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

To ensure high-quality publications, all original articles will be subject to editorial and peer review.

After an article is submitted, the editors will conduct an initial review, checking if the text fits the journal’s scope and if it meets the quality standards. Articles considered out of the scope can be rejected with no peer review, according to the editor’s criteria. If the article is approved in its initial evaluation stage, it will be sent to peer review.

Based on the general recommendations of reviewers, the editors will decide and communicate to authors about it. The editor-in-chief is responsible for the final decision of approval or rejection of the article.

 The author can receive one of the three editorial decisions below:

• Accept: the text will be published in its original format.

• Accept with revision: the text will be published only after the changes suggested by the reviewers and/or editors.

• Reject: the text will not be published nor reconsidered.

If acceptance is subject to change, it will be up to the editorial team to decide whether the changes made by the author were adequate or not, and whether the points raised by the reviewers were considered. If necessary, editors can request a new evaluation round. After checking all the changes made, the article will be accepted or will receive final rejection. Specific resources or problems will be examined and decided by the editorial team.